The judicial ruling of unconstitutionality regarding Panama Ports has been interpreted in some circles as part of a struggle between hegemonic powers — China and the United States — in which the Republic of Panama is inevitably caught. In reality, it is a geopolitical competition in which the smallest of the protagonists will suffer the consequences, as the Asian country, allegedly the most affected, has already warned. While the giants fight, the ordinary citizen observes with indignation how the figures who, for years, drafted the monstrous port contracts, walk unpunished and enjoy the riches obtained through despicable acts that are a clear betrayal of the homeland. Lawyers of recognized standing point out that the Supreme Court's ruling on the port concession reveals how the State negotiates, supervises, and even legally shields these contracts. The truth is that it is not the State that negotiates, but individuals, invested with temporary power — presidents, ministers, or deputies — who sell the country in favor of personal interests. The result of such behavior is evidenced by the unconstitutionality ruling issued by the highest justice body. The message from the Supreme Court highlights the weaknesses in the supervision of compliance with contracts between the State and private corporations. It is outrageous that automatic renewals of agreements were approved without meeting the established requirements. Panama Ports Company.
Panama Ports Scandal: A Judicial Ruling
A Panamanian court ruled contracts with Panama Ports unconstitutional. The public welcomed the decision but demands penalties for those responsible. Experts see it as part of a geopolitical struggle between China and the USA involving Panama.
