Citizens and energy sector actors see this proposal as an opportunity to diversify the energy matrix and reduce dependence on fossil fuels, thus being beneficial and generating opportunities for the people. For Deputy Crispiano Adames, the issue has been controversial, especially regarding the incorporation of ethanol as an additive in gasoline. While certain sectors consider that this measure could bring economic and environmental benefits, others warn about possible impacts on consumer costs and vehicle performance. The Veraguas deputy, Janine Prado, details that there is a need to analyze the proposal in greater depth before its final approval. Bill 443, which proposes amendments to Law 42 of April 20, 2011, on the national policy of biofuels and electrical energy from biomass, has generated opposing positions in different sectors of the country after passing its first debate in the National Assembly. According to the union leader Ángel Ruíz, the initiative also contemplates modifying an article of the Fiscal Code, which has raised concerns among the Panamanian population. Among the main concerns is the possibility of making ethanol use mandatory in the country, which, in the opinion of many, should be reconsidered and made optional. 'It must be carefully evaluated whether the use of ethanol in gasoline will be mandatory or optional, always prioritizing the well-being of the consumer,' voices within the Legislative Body have stated, who believe that the use of ethanol in gasoline should not be mandatory. Amid the discussion, critical sectors argue that mandatory implementation could generate uncertainty in the market and affect both users and distributors, while others defend the measure as a step towards sustainable development and the use of renewable resources. Bill 443 will continue its legislative process in the upcoming debates, in a context where public opinion remains divided and awaiting the decisions that the National Assembly will make.
